Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 77
Filtrar
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; : 1-2, 2024 Feb 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38419431

RESUMO

In an identified quality improvement effort, nurses were observed regarding their workflow while in contact precaution rooms. Multiple opportunities for hand hygiene were missed while nurses were in gloves, predominantly while moving between "dirty" and "clean" tasks. An education initiative afterward did not show improvement in hand hygiene rates.

2.
United European Gastroenterol J ; 12(1): 11-21, 2024 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38206118

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a major risk factor for advanced liver disease. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to assess the prevalence and associated risk factors of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in primary care centers participating in the diabetes disease management program (DMP) in Germany. METHODS: A total of 175 participants with the diagnosis of T2DM were enrolled in two primary care centers. Steatotic liver disease (SLD; hepatic steatosis, ≥275 dB/m), fibrosis (≥8 kPa), and cirrhosis (≥15 kPa) were assessed non-invasively using vibration-controlled transient elastography. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify clinical predictors of fibrosis and cirrhosis. The AUDIT questionnaire was used to screen for alcohol consumption, and a score ≥8 was considered harmful alcohol consumption. RESULTS: The majority of participants were male (62%), and the median age was 66 years (interquartile range 59; 71). The median body mass index was 31.1 kg/m2 , with 58.9% of the participants being obese. Harmful alcohol consumption was prevalent in 8.0% and 20.0% of the entire cohort and in those with cirrhosis, respectively. The prevalence of SLD, fibrosis, and cirrhosis was 77.1%, 42.3%, and 12.0%, respectively. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, obesity, and harmful alcohol consumption were associated with the highest odds of fibrosis (odds ratio [OR] 5.198, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.269-11.908) and cirrhosis (OR 5.615, 95% CI 1.274-24.756), respectively. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients seen in the diabetes DMP in Germany is high. Obesity and harmful alcohol consumption increase the risk of fibrosis and cirrhosis in people with T2DM. Screening for advanced liver disease and associated risk factors within the DMP program may reduce the liver disease burden in this high-risk population.


Assuntos
Alcoolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Cirrose Hepática/diagnóstico , Cirrose Hepática/epidemiologia , Cirrose Hepática/etiologia , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/diagnóstico , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/efeitos adversos , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Alcoolismo/complicações , Gerenciamento Clínico
3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36483343

RESUMO

Electronic hand hygiene monitoring systems allow the collection of large volumes of data. However, significant resources are required to validate and maintain these systems. Additionally, data are lacking on the correlation with clinically important outcomes. Direct observation of hand hygiene remains the gold standard for monitoring hand hygiene compliance.

4.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36483388

RESUMO

Objective: We implemented a preoperative staphylococcal decolonization protocol for colorectal surgeries if efforts to further reduce surgical site infections (SSIs). Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting: Tertiary-care, academic medical center. Patients: Adult patients who underwent colorectal surgery, as defined by National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN), between July 2015 and June 2020. Emergent cases were excluded. Methods: Simple and multivariable logistic regression were performed to evaluate the relationship between decolonization and subsequent SSI. Other predictive variables included age, sex, body mass index, procedure duration, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, diabetes, smoking, and surgical oncology service. Results: In total, 1,683 patients underwent nonemergent NHSN-defined colorectal surgery, and 33.7% underwent the staphylococcal decolonization protocol. SSI occurred in 92 (5.5%); 53 were organ-space infections and 39 were superficial wound infections. We detected no difference in overall SSIs between those decolonized and not decolonized (P = .17). However, superficial wound infections were reduced in the group that received decolonization versus those that did not: 7 (1.2%) of 568 versus 32 (2.9%) of 1,115 (P = .04). Conclusions: Staphylococcal decolonization may prevent a subset of SSIs in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

5.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(28): e29750, 2022 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35839058

RESUMO

Outcomes for critically ill people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV) have changed with the use of antiretroviral therapy (ART). To identify these outcomes and correlates of mortality in a contemporary critically ill cohort in an urban academic medical center in Baltimore, a city with a high burden of HIV, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of individuals admitted to a medical intensive care unit (MICU) at a tertiary care center between 2009 and 2014. PLHIV who were at least 18 years of age with an index MICU admission of ≥24 hours during the 5-year study period were included in this analysis. Data were obtained for participants from the time of MICU admission until hospital discharge and up to 180 days after MICU admission. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of hospital mortality. Between June 2009 and June 2014, 318 PLHIV admitted to the MICU met inclusion criteria. Eighty-six percent of the patients were non-Hispanic Blacks. Poorly controlled HIV was very common with 70.2% of patients having a CD4 cell count <200 cells/mm3 within 3 months prior to admission and only 34% of patients having an undetectable HIV viral load. Hospital mortality for the cohort was 17%. In a univariate model, mortality did not differ by demographic variables, CD4 cell count, HIV viral load, or ART use. Regression analysis adjusted by relevant covariates revealed that MICU patients admitted from the hospital ward were 6.4 times more likely to die in hospital than those admitted from emergency department. Other positive predictors were a diagnosis of end-stage liver disease, cardiac arrest, ventilator-dependent respiratory failure, vasopressor requirement, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and symptomatic cytomegalovirus disease. In conclusion, in this critically ill cohort with HIV infection, most predictors of mortality were not directly related to HIV and were similar to those for the general population.


Assuntos
Estado Terminal , Infecções por HIV , Estudos de Coortes , Estado Terminal/terapia , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
J Infect ; 84(3): 297-310, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34982962

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the short-term effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines among immunocompromised patients to prevent laboratory-confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 infection. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis. We calculated the pooled diagnostic odds ratio [DOR] (95% CI) for COVID-19 infection between immunocompromised patients and healthy people or those with stable chronic medical conditions. VE was estimated as 100% x (1-DOR). We also investigated the rates of developing anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein IgG between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Twenty studies evaluating COVID-19 vaccine response, and four studies evaluating VE were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled DOR for symptomatic COVID-19 infection in immunocompromised patients was 0.296 (95% CI: 0.108-0.811) with an estimated VE of 70.4% (95% CI: 18.9%- 89.2%). When stratified by diagnosis, IgG antibody levels were much higher in the control group compared to immunocompromised patients with solid organ transplant (pOR 232.3; 95% Cl: 66.98-806.03), malignant diseases (pOR 42.0, 95% Cl: 11.68-151.03), and inflammatory rheumatic diseases (pOR 19.06; 95% Cl: 5.00-72.62). CONCLUSIONS: We found COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were effective against symptomatic COVID-19 among the immunocompromised patients but had lower VE compared to the controls. Further research is needed to understand the discordance between antibody production and protection against symptomatic COVID-19 infection.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Hospitalização , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , SARS-CoV-2
12.
Am J Infect Control ; 50(2): 226-228, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34543707

RESUMO

The relationship between nursing staffing levels and healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) has been explored previously with conflicting results. This study uses daily shift records from 2 intensive care units (ICUs) to evaluate whether nuanced changes in nursing team composition impacts subsequent risk for device associated HAIs. Staffing deficiencies may be associated with periods of risk prior to central line-associated bloodstream infection in the ICU.


Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Infecção Hospitalar , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Infecções Urinárias , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva
14.
Patient Saf Surg ; 15(1): 36, 2021 Oct 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34706755

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic surgical prophylaxis is a core strategy for prevention of surgical site infections (SSI). Despite best practice guidelines and known efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in decreasing SSI risk, there is often wide variation in its use. This study was designed to determine the individual perspectives of perioperative providers at an academic tertiary referral center regarding their knowledge of preoperative antibiotic choice, dosing, and timing. METHODS: A prospective survey was conducted amongst surgical and anesthesia team members involved in preoperative antibiotic decision making. The survey addressed ten key principles relating to preoperative antibiotic use, including antibiotic choice, timing and rate of infusion, and dosing. The survey was distributed among orthopaedic surgeons, residents, and anesthesia providers at their respective monthly service line meetings between August 2017 to June 2019. The data was stored and analyzed in a Microsoft Excel worksheet. RESULTS: A total of 73 providers completed the survey. Twenty-two (30 %) of the providers agreed and 47 (64 %) disagreed that both vancomycin and cefazolin are equally effective for antibiotic prophylaxis. As for antibiotic choice in patients with penicillin allergies, 37 (51 %) agreed with vancomycin, 21 (29 %) agreed with clindamycin, and 15 (21 %) disagreed with both alternatives. When providers were surveyed regarding the appropriateness of standard versus weight adjusted dosing, 67 (92 %) agreed that vancomycin should be weight adjusted and 63 (86 %) agreed that cefazolin should be weight adjusted. CONCLUSIONS: There is no clear consensus amongst providers for which antibiotic to administer for antibiotic prophylaxis despite existing guidelines. Discrepancy also exists between orthopaedic surgery and anesthesia providers in regards to appropriate antibiotic choice for patients with reported penicillin allergies. Institutions should implement evidence-based protocols for preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis and continue to prospectively monitor compliance in order to identify any inconsistencies that could result in inappropriate antibiotic prophylaxis for patients.

15.
Curr Infect Dis Rep ; 23(10): 15, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34426728

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We describe the similarities between antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) and infection prevention programs (IPPs), and we discuss how these similarities lend themselves to synergy between programs. We also discuss how the COVID-19 pandemic has generated further opportunities for future collaborations that could benefit both programs. RECENT FINDINGS: The COVID-19 pandemic has created new needs, such as real-time data and access to personnel important to both programs, such as information technologists and infectious diseases specialists. It has also increased concerns about rising rates of antimicrobial resistance and healthcare-associated infections, both of which overlap significantly and are key focus areas for both ASPs and IPPs. These emergent issues have highlighted the need for enhanced program infrastructure and new team models. The shift towards telecommunication and telework has facilitated the creation of enhanced infrastructures for collaboration on activities ranging from data access and reporting to providing telehealth services to remote hospitals. These enhanced infrastructures can be leveraged in future collaborative efforts between ASPs and IPPs. SUMMARY: Collaboration between IPPs and ASPs can mitigate setbacks experienced by health systems during the current pandemic, enhance the performance of both programs in the post-pandemic era and increase their preparedness for future pandemic threats. As health systems plan for the post-pandemic era, they should invest in opportunities for synergy between ASPs and IPPs highlighted during the pandemic.

18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36168508

RESUMO

Challenges for infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship programs have arisen with the fourth wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, fueled by the delta variant. These challenges include breakthrough infections in vaccinated individuals, decisions to re-escalate infection prevention measures, critical medication shortages, and provider burnout. Various strategies are needed to meet these challenges.

19.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 42(8): 1007-1009, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33213548

RESUMO

The use of an electronic hand hygiene monitoring system (EHHMS) decreased due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We analyzed dispenser use, hand hygiene (HH) badge use, and HH compliance to determine the effect of COVID-19 on EHHMS use and HH compliance. HH product shortages and other pandemic-induced challenges influenced EHHMS use.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecção Hospitalar , Higiene das Mãos , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Eletrônica , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Controle de Infecções , SARS-CoV-2 , Tecnologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...